Posted on 29/10/2014 13:04:44
Hej Morten,
Now, thanks allot for your help! :-) I am sure we will find the best solution to it.
I know that we can use your examples, to achieve same thing that assortment does, that's all allright.
Me and my collegues decided to share some thoughts about assortments so far.
Here is our feedback on assortments, please feel free to collaborate:
So this is the assortment information example, where X means that in this case product must be included in the ProductList, and search index, filtering etc...
http://screencast.com/t/I4Ktj5Y1j3al
With the way (now DW works as we understood) In this picture, turns out that "Everyone" has bigger priority, than UserA or UserB.
Adding product to "Everyone" is the same as Remove product from Assortments.
This means that if "Apple" is selected for Everyone, than "User A" will still get it, no matter if he wishes it or not.
And if "User B" wishes to see only Apples and Cherry (because Everyone is everyone, and practically gets kind of bigger priority) - "User B" will still get Banana.
Only In case with "Watermelon" Both users will get desired results.
On another side, if we forget about "Everyone" and use Not authenticated user (Anonymous User) instead.
http://screencast.com/t/LkjdiIzb
Than, since everyone has it's own set of listed products - everyone is happy.
Just so when we are talking assortments - we are talking User profiles that are loggedin. But not yet loggedin user - it is the same user, and it would be great to have his own preset.
Than obviously if product is not in noones assortment set (in other words it is not in the assortments at all) - than it is for "Everyone" in any case.
Hope you see what I mean, please feel free to collaborate.
/Dmitrij